Skip to main content
LatinFlash Research Paper 2026-09 Draft Spec · Formal Review Passed Pre-Registered

Vertical AI Governance Stack v1.1 — Draft Specification & Pre-Registered Validation Protocol

Formalizing Verifiable Execution Properties, Dual Conformance Paths (Path A Topology vs Path B Equivalence), and Pre-Registered Human Inter-Rater Validation Protocol.

Pre-Registered HashesSpec: 329f851e... | Matrix: aa8feb98...

1. Specification & Research Status

Status: Draft Specification — Formal Review Passed

The v1.1 specification has completed internal formal review, normative keyword auditing (RFC 2119 / RFC 8174), requirements traceability analysis, conformance harness validation, targeted mutation testing (7/7 mutants detected), and adversarial equivalence testing (5/5 attacks rejected). Independent human inter-rater validation is currently pending external execution.

Human Validation Status: External Evaluation Pending

Distribution packages (evaluator-A.zip and evaluator-B.zip) have been frozen and cryptographically pinned. Reproducibility claims (V1.1 CONFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPRODUCIBILITY VALIDATED) will not be asserted until independent external human evaluations have been completed, returned, and scored post-hoc.

2. Pre-Registered Experimental State

To eliminate post-hoc bias and prevent retrospective specification adjustments, all experimental materials and acceptance criteria have been pre-registered prior to external evaluator exposure:

PRE-REGISTERED STATE

Cryptographically Sealed Research Pipeline

  • ✓ Specification frozen before human evaluation — SHA-256: 329f851e1c5ae268fb5604dc8768308ee55fd60cbacbb88da2f8161c3f994804
  • ✓ Test corpus frozen before human evaluation — 28 complete cases (6 Reference Base, 10 Synthetic Boundary, 7 Mutation, 5 Path B Adversarial)
  • ✓ Expected outcomes sealed before human evaluation — Isolated in private pre-registration storage (sealed oracles & case coverage manifest)
  • ✓ Acceptance criteria defined before human evaluation — Cohen's Kappa, inter-rater % agreement, and oracle alignment metrics
  • ⏳ Human results pending — External execution with real independent human auditors in progress

3. Five-Tier Normative Hierarchy

The v1.1 specification establishes a strict 5-tier conceptual hierarchy separating normative properties from reference implementations:

Tier Layer Name Normative Status Definition
Level 0 Governance Invariant Mandatory Invariant Probabilistic intelligence must never override deterministic authority.
Level 1 Proof Obligations Normative Requirement Seven verifiable execution properties (Authority, Identity, Scope, Integrity, Evidence, Outcome, Recovery).
Level 2 Conformance Requirements Normative Criteria 22 explicit requirement criteria (RFC 2119 MUST/SHOULD/MAY clauses).
Level 3 Reference Architecture Informative Pattern Canonical 6-layer architecture (L1 Policy, L2 CVA, L3 Schema, L4 Gateway, L5 Audit, L6 Recovery).
Level 4 Reference Implementations Informative Exemplar Concrete software implementations (e.g. Envoy Wasm sidecars, OPA Rego engines, SPIFFE SVIDs).

4. Formal Requirements Matrix & Keyword Audit

The formal requirements matrix establishes 22 normative clauses. A non-overlapping keyword scanner audited all RFC 2119 keywords:

22
Normative Requirements
59
Simple MUST Clauses
17
Compound MUST NOT Clauses
0
Unmapped / Orphan Criteria

5. Dual Conformance Paths (Path A vs Path B)

v1.1 explicitly separates Path A (Physical Reference Topology) from Path B (Functional Equivalence):

PATH A / PHYSICAL TOPOLOGY

Path A: Direct Layer Replication

Architectures physically replicating components L1 through L6 as distinct containerized microservices or proxy sidecars.

PATH B / FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENCE

Path B: Conformance by Equivalence

Alternative single-binary or sandbox architectures (e.g., Envoy Wasm proxy sidecar) demonstrating functional equivalence through verifiable cryptographic proof bundles.

6. Adversarial Falsification Review

To assert that Path B does not become a loophole for non-conformant implementations, 5 adversarial equivalence attacks were evaluated:

  • ADV-01 (Sidecar Direct Port Exposure): Exposed backend port 8080 alongside Wasm port 8443 → REJECTED (Fails REQ-CR-1).
  • ADV-02 (Logging-Only Advisory Gateway): Non-blocking OPA evaluation → REJECTED (Fails REQ-INV-01).
  • ADV-03 (TEE Remote Attestation without OAuth/RBAC): Hardware quote without user authority grant → REJECTED (Fails REQ-PO-AUTH).
  • ADV-04 (Post-Hoc Audit Signing): KMS signature 10 min post-execution without pre-hash → REJECTED (Fails REQ-PO-INT).
  • ADV-05 (Fallback Route Bypass): Legacy API endpoint bypassing Wasm filter → REJECTED (Fails REQ-CR-1, REQ-CR-6).

7. Internal Robustness Validation Results

Validation Metric Target Threshold Measured Result Status
Executed Robustness Cases 28 Cases 28 Cases (6 Base + 10 Boundary + 7 Mutants + 5 Adversarial) PASS
Targeted Mutation Detection Rate 100.0% 7 / 7 Targeted Mutants Detected PASS
Path B Equivalence Attack Rejection 100.0% 5 / 5 False-Equivalence Attacks Rejected PASS
Programmatic Profile Agreement 100.0% Strict vs Property-Based Profile Agreement: 100.00% PASS
Programmatic Cohen's Kappa 1.0000 1.0000 (Perfect Programmatic Consistency) PASS
Human Inter-Rater Status External Human Evaluation Pending Real External Auditor Execution PENDING

8. Human Validation Protocol & Checksums

Distribution packages for external evaluators have been anonymized, stripped of requirement IDs and interpretive language, and cryptographically pinned:

Distribution Archive File Size SHA-256 Checksum Status
evaluator-A.zip 62,050 bytes 2d8d301101125dbcc9d49a065a86a3271ace920f4e8b13116da5fc054ca02ebc VERIFIED & FROZEN
evaluator-B.zip 62,050 bytes 4d45be74449d5223508cac41ab7f92d9a845bc2467036f23e53c25093aff891d VERIFIED & FROZEN

9. Research Progression Sequence

COLLECTION STATUS

Vertical AI Governance

  • v1.0 Canonical Spec: FROZEN
  • v1.1 Draft Spec: FORMAL REVIEW PASSED
  • Conformance Test Suite: INTERNAL VALIDATION PASSED
  • Robustness Harness: INTERNAL VALIDATION PASSED
  • Human Inter-Rater Validation: EXTERNAL EVALUATION PENDING
RESEARCH PROGRESSION

Milestone Tracker

  • Framework definition: COMPLETE
  • Applied validation: COMPLETE
  • External framework audits: IN PROGRESS
  • Adversarial falsification: COMPLETE
  • v1.1 formal specification: COMPLETE — DRAFT
  • Internal conformance tests: COMPLETE
  • Robustness testing: COMPLETE
  • Human inter-rater study: PENDING